History of self-regulation and self-government (non-Russian community self-government) has in Russia for almost 130 years. Historical examples of popular self-organization and transfer of state authority are also Cossacks and repurchase (the transfer of authority to levy taxes and fees coming into the state budget). Thus, the history of this phenomenon is long enough. This principle is also incorporated into the concept of the draft federal law "On audit "to regulate the activities of auditors was considered necessary for its introduction in the regulation of insurance activities. From the analysis of the various activities that the establishment of sro possible service delivery areas, which require licensing of businesses and the subsequent monitoring of compliance with the conditions of licensing activities. Read additional details here: Howard Schultz. An example of cpo in the construction is np 'Association Center for designers' Sphere-A'. Any construction company can enter into the construction of SROs 'Sphere-A' and obtain a certificate of admission to the construction work, after which it is permitted construction activities. A person providing services have a certain level of professional qualifications (and hence are certified). The primary purpose of cpo in the construction of the regulation of relations between people on the basis of self-organization, ie, without direct government intervention. Surgical intervention of the state is replaced by legal regulation and enforcement of legislation self-regulatory organizations. When you create an sro in the building society and the state are up to several positive effects. First, reduced government expenditure on regulation and control. Secondly, the increased efficiency of public administration at the expense of replacing the operational control of business in the legislative regulation and by reducing administrative communications: subject to regulation and control are one or more SROs in construction, and not many businesses. Third, forming a mechanism for preventing corruption of public officials, because it eliminates the need for direct interaction between entrepreneurs and officials on matters of everyday business activities. Fourth, the entrepreneurs have an opportunity to impact on the controller (by the election authorities and SROs to monitor their activities, monitor the expenditure of dues). This reduces transaction and other costs are excluded bribes to officials. In Unlike taxes paid to the state budget, monitor expenditure of the taxpayers who are not in a position, membership fees in the sro are targeted, and their spending can controlled by its members. Targeted nature of contributions in self-regulatory organization makes them look like taxes paid, but not the whole population, but only those who decided to enter into the construction of SROs and uses appropriate services. Fifthly, the existence of disciplinary coercion by the SROs for their members – the violators of existing rules and the rights of clients – can quickly direct and maintain order in SROs in the construction industry.