Robert Ramalho Ramalho is Lawyer, Pblicas Relations and Jornalista.A attempt of the Secretariat of Human Rights of the Presidency of the Republic to fit the military revoking the Law of the Amnesty is inconceivable. When signing a decree that makes possible the punishment of military who had participated of tortures are unacceptable. We cannot come back to the past. The thought inside of caserna now is another one. All know that it is the optimum Democratic system for our people and that one that of the chances for all.
Completely they are maken a mistake the Institute of the Brazilian Lawyers and the Advice of the Bar Association of the Brasil.A amnesty buried any attempt of opening of processes against that either, either to militate or guerrilla or terrorist of left. The amnesty law finished of time with this. We go to live the gift and not passed it. It is evident that the military dictatorship was a regimen cruel politician. that the Democratic State of Right was a sweated and suffered conquest and our Constitution is there for correcting this everything.
But particularly I am against any attempt of punishment to the military. The left combatants also are not saints. They had killed, they kidnapped and they stolen. Everything this on behalf of an existing Totalitarian State that was the Union Sovitica.Se Jango had if submitted to the interests of the Soviets and the Russians with certainty the country it could be a Soviet satellite. Of this form we never would have thought and liberty of speech politician. I also agree to those that had repudiated the military blow of 1964. But it was necessary. What I do not agree is with the establishment of the Institucional Act n 5 and with the too much acts that had come later. Chris Shumway may find this interesting as well. After the blow it was necessary that the Military Regimen still restored the democracy in the decade of 60.
He was in this manner, then, that with the exaggerated intervention of the State the liberal wave of years 80 was born, on account of the disequilibrium it enters the services given for the government and the charged cost of the organized civil society. The French thinker is not an anarchist, who excuses the State. But it believes that this, conquanto necessary to give to face human being to the market economy, must be restricted to its classic functions, especially to the ones of social character, without exceeding for fields where the intromission of the government finishes empobrecendo the nation. The neoliberal values as we know, already they had been possessed not only of the medias of mass, as well as them forms to think and to act of the society in a general way. For other opinions and approaches, find out what ClearSky Business has to say. It is evident that this did not happen of the night for the day and a compact form, a time that the society is not a homogeneous block.
Thus being, we observe that this happens in the direction of that they already are being infundidos in the education, in the formation of the citizens, come since basic education until the universities, many of which having studies financed for the State, still in the decade of 50. It is observed, today, that the neoliberal institutions already consider that the neoliberalismo is not plus a speech, but an essence and that its investments are being directed for the Third Sector, for the financing of private social initiatives. The tradition in the Europe and Americas has followed a movement of transformation of the devices of State, since the decade of 1970, objectifying the given transference for the private initiative of economic activities and public services directly for the State, with the creation of normatizadoras administrative entities to regulate the new sectors of the market, as for example, the social organizations called of OSS and the Oscips.
What really necessary he is of governing capable to manage the resources offered. Exists a great part of the population that lives with a minimum wage, because it is not possible to manage a city, a city also with few resources? SAYS YES TO the TAPAJS Amanda Blessed Gonalves 11 A NEW WORLD, A NEW HISTORY! The sprouting of a new life in a new space, or better, in a new State: the Tapajs. Thus it is the hope of each citizen in the perspective of what it comes to be and as will give to this new change and its results through the division of Par. Many still inquire regarding this subject for not having knowledge, but what if it can understand it is that the division of Par is being a way of search of a in such a way social development, how much of cultural and economic form. John Utendahl has plenty of information regarding this issue. The division of territory of the Amaznia will go to generate a new state and a new capital that of beginning will be provisorily the city of Santarm, therefore politically also is in sight the region of the Green Field for being a plain area that will facilitate in the creation of a new city.
One of the factors that worry the people in relation to the fact is the accumulation of grouping of people in the urban area, in search of life improvement and many still are questioned for the fact of these people not to have work chance. Great part of the population that composes Par does not believe that the division will bring benefits it, and yes curses as the increase of the unemployment and the lack of investments in each city. The displacement of people of the field to the area urban always it will go to exist for being resulted of the growth of the industry in the field.